Bleats

Never Forget: Dr Seuss Drew Racist Cartoons Before His Kids' Books Took Off

Horton hears a nope.

They say don’t get to know your childhood heroes too well because you’ll end up disappointed. I guess I never learn.

After finding out that Jackie Chan is a terrible person and Roald Dahl was an antisemite, I regret to inform everyone that the beloved Dr. Seuss, author of classics such as The Lorax, Horton Hears a Who! and The Cat in the Hat, drew racist cartoons before he became famous.

Between 1920s through to the 1940s, Theodor Seuss Geisel made a living drawing advertising and political cartoons. While Seuss was known for his political views and anti-fascism stance, even he was not immune from having some of the same views on non-whites that his contemporaries had.

Black people were drawn as grass skirt-wearing savages, Arabs were nomads or sultans who rode camels, and the Japanese were buck-toothed and squint-eyed. In fact, Seuss held a very strong anti-Japanese view during WWII and was quoted as saying:

“If we want to win, we’ve got to kill Japs, whether it depresses John Haynes Holmes or not. We can get palsy-walsy afterward with those that are left.”

If you want to see some of Dr. Seuss’ old cartoons, then click here. Just be warned that you may find them offensive and/or upsetting. Since we don’t condone racism of any kind here at GOAT, here are some kittens to help cleanse the palette a bit.

But don’t start burning all your Dr. Seuss books just yet because this story has a happyish ending.

After WWII, Seuss managed to overcome his earlier anti-Japanese stance and grew to regret some of the racist cartoons he drew. In a redemptive arc worthy of a supervillain, Seuss drew a bunch of anti-racist cartoons later in his career and expressed regret for his animosity towards the Japanese.

In fact, Seuss used Horton Hears a Who! as an allegory for America’s post-war occupation of Japan and to send a message of equality.

Horton approves of this redemptive arc.

For all the good (and bad) he brought into the world with his work, Dr. Seuss’ views prove that he’s quite the flawed human being. But unlike Roald Dahl, it’s at least nice to know that Seuss tried to mend his ways after realising that maybe drawing racist cartoons and being anti-Japanese wasn’t the right way to go.

Scarlett Johansson Is Proof That Hollywood Still Has A Lot To Learn About Whitewashing

Another day, another ScarJo faux pas.

“Foot in mouth” disease is something we all get from time to time and Scarlett Johansson caught a huge case of it when she said that she “should be allowed to play any person, or any tree, or any animal” because she’s an *checks notes* an actor.

Given the controversy over her being cast as Major Motoko Kusanagi in 2017’s live-action adaptation of Ghost in the Shell and her being cast (and subsequent withdrawal from the role) as Dante “Tex” Gill, a transgender man, in an upcoming biopic called Rub & Tug, her comment went about as well as you expected and the subsequent internet dogpile was as brutal as it was hilarious.

“I’ve made a huge mistake.”

Scarlett quickly clarified her comments and played the “taken out of context” card, telling Buzzfeed in a statement that she was merely trying to say “any actor should be able to play anybody and art, in all forms, should be immune to political correctness” but her words came out all cross-eyed.

To be fair, she does acknowledge that “there is a wide spread discrepancy amongst [her] industry that favors Caucasian, cis-gendered actors and that not every actor has been given the same opportunities that [she’s] have been privileged to” so it’s not like she’s totally clueless about the whole thing.

Well, mostly.

Now as fun as it is to take the piss out of Scarlett (again) for saying something dumb regarding identity politics and “art”, we shouldn’t focus all the memes and jokes on her alone.

Cis actors playing trans people and whitewashing has been around for ages and Scarlett is far from the only actor to dip their toes in those unsavoury pools. Despite minorities and underrepresented communities getting greater awareness these days in media, the sad truth is that Hollywood has a long way to go before it gets to a place where it remotely resembles acceptable.

So with Scarlett’s latest kerfuffle still fresh in everyone’s minds, let’s just take a short trip down memory lane and remember a few notable times where Hollywood decided to cast white, cisgender folks in minority roles that could’ve gone to, you know, actual people from those communities.

Emma Stone in Aloha

No matter how you spin this or how many lines of expository dialogue you shove in the script explaining it, no one is going to buy Emma Stone playing a character who is of Swedish, Hawaiian and Chinese descent.

The cast of Exodus: Gods and Kings

For a film about ancient Egypt set in Biblical times, there’s a noticeable lack of Egyptians in it and no amount of method acting from Christian Bale or Aaron Paul can make up for it.

Jared Leto in Dallas Buyers Club

Whereas Scarlett got blasted for getting cast as a transgender man, Jared Leto got oodles of critical acclaim for playing Rayon, a transgender woman dying of AIDS, and ended up winning an Oscar for his performance. Seems like losing half your body weight for a role really does take attention away from the whole cis actor playing a trans person thing.

Eddie Redmayne in The Danish Girl

Basically the same thing as Jared Leto in Dallas Buyers Club except that Eddie was playing a real life person, Lili Elbe, and he “only” got an Oscar nomination and not the win.

Jeffrey Tambor in Transparent

Again, same situation as Jared Leto and Eddie Redmayne, except that Transparent is a TV show and Jeffrey Tambor is a creep who has since been deservedly cancelled.

Mickey Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany’s

Yeah, no words can describe how racist and wrong this is.

Pop-up Channel

Follow Us